- Fig. 1. Map of the intact forest landscapes in the boreal
- Fig. 2. Means and standard deviations of the coverage
- Fig. 3. NMDS ordination of the vegetation plots sampled А
- Fig. 3. NMDS ordination of the vegetation plots sampled В
- Fig. 4. Ranges and mean ecological values of the forest types
- Fig. 5. Proportion of species of different ecological-coenotic groups
- Fig. 6. Piceeta (Abieta) fruticoso-hylocomiosa in the plain part of the Komi Republic left
- Fig. 6. Piceeta (Abieta) fruticoso-hylocomiosa in the plain part of the Komi Republic right
- Fig. 7. Soil profiles (a – Podzol and b – Albeluvisol) in the Piceeta-Abieta fruticoso-hylocomiosa A
- Fig. 7. Soil profiles (a – Podzol and b – Albeluvisol) in the Piceeta-Abieta fruticoso-hylocomiosa B
- Fig. 8. Piceeta parviherboso-hylocomiosa in the upper reaches of the Vashka River
- Fig. 9. Piceeto-Abieta nemoralo-borealiherbosa in the upper reaches of the Suran River A
- Fig. 9. Piceeto-Abieta nemoralo-borealiherbosa in the upper reaches of the Suran River B
- Fig. 10. Piceeto-Abieta magnofilicosum with Dryopteris dilatata in the 5th
- Fig. 11. Piceeto-Abieta magnoherbosa with Athyrium filix-femina
- Fig. 12. Piceeto-Abieta nitrophilo-magnoherbosa in the Suran River
- Fig. 13. Soil profiles (a – Dystric Fluvisol and b – Gleysol) in the Piceeta A
- Fig. 13. Soil profiles (a – Dystric Fluvisol and b – Gleysol) in the Piceeta B
- Fig. 14. Boxplots of the coverage of deadwoods at different stages of their
Copyright © 2016 RJEE. THE ONLINE EDITION IS REGISTERED IN THE FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, AND MASS MEDIA. REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE № FS 77 – 62950 from 04.09.2015.